context | F,G in C⟶D |
definiendum | η in F∙→G |
inclusion | η:∏(A:ObC)FA→GA |
postulate | η∘F(f)=G(f)∘η |
Here, in the postulate, I've left the components (ηA,ηB etc.) implicit.
Natural transformation form a collection of arrows within a single category which are compatible with the (structure preserving) functors.
If one thinks about it for a minute, the data provided with a natural transformation can in fact be reformulated as just another functor, namely in C×(∙→∙)⟶D. This mirrors a homotopy.
For any A:ObC, we write ηA for the map FA→GA. This is called the component of the natural transformation η at A.
Wikipedia: Natural transformation