Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
bayes_algorithm [2016/10/26 22:45] nikolaj |
bayes_algorithm [2016/10/29 16:33] nikolaj |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| | @#55CCEE: context | @#55CCEE: $W_z:X\to {\mathbb R}$ | | | @#55CCEE: context | @#55CCEE: $W_z:X\to {\mathbb R}$ | | ||
| | @#FF9944: definition | @#FF9944: $\Gamma: (X\to {\mathbb R})\to X\to {\mathbb R}$ | | | @#FF9944: definition | @#FF9944: $\Gamma: (X\to {\mathbb R})\to X\to {\mathbb R}$ | | ||
| - | | @#FF9944: definition | @#FF9944: $bel_{\mathrm out}[bel_{\mathrm in}](x) := N^*W_z(x)\int_A K_u(x,x')\,bel_{\mathrm in}(x'){\mathrm d}$ | | + | | @#FF9944: definition | @#FF9944: $bel_{\mathrm out}[bel_{\mathrm in}](x) := N^*W_z(x)\int_A K_u(x,x')\,bel_{\mathrm in}(x'){\mathrm d}x'$ | |
| + | |||
| + | >this is the algorithm for the case where all the ingredient have these types. In practice, Coming up with an initial $bel$ is a also part of the task. | ||
| + | >$N^*$ is supposed to be the normalization of the whole term on the right of it - a normalization to the sum/integral of $bel_{\mathrm in}$. In practice, the latter should normalize to $1$. | ||
| ----- | ----- | ||
| === Discussion === | === Discussion === | ||
| - | $N^*$ is supposed to be the normalization of the whole term on the right of it - a normalization to the sum/integral of $bel_{\mathrm in}$. In practice, the latter should normalize to $1$. | ||
| $K_u(x,x')$ ought to capture the propagation, possibly determined by actions $u$. | $K_u(x,x')$ ought to capture the propagation, possibly determined by actions $u$. | ||
