Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
bayes_algorithm [2016/10/27 18:07]
nikolaj
bayes_algorithm [2016/10/30 17:43]
nikolaj
Line 5: Line 5:
 | @#FF9944: definition ​ | @#FF9944: $\Gamma: (X\to {\mathbb R})\to X\to {\mathbb R}$ | | @#FF9944: definition ​ | @#FF9944: $\Gamma: (X\to {\mathbb R})\to X\to {\mathbb R}$ |
 | @#FF9944: definition ​ | @#FF9944: $bel_{\mathrm out}[bel_{\mathrm in}](x) := N^*W_z(x)\int_A K_u(x,​x'​)\,​bel_{\mathrm in}(x'​){\mathrm d}x'$ | | @#FF9944: definition ​ | @#FF9944: $bel_{\mathrm out}[bel_{\mathrm in}](x) := N^*W_z(x)\int_A K_u(x,​x'​)\,​bel_{\mathrm in}(x'​){\mathrm d}x'$ |
 +
 +>this is the algorithm for the case where all the ingredient have these types. In practice, Coming up with an initial $bel$ is a also part of the task.
 +>$N^*$ is supposed to be the normalization of the whole term on the right of it - a normalization to the sum/​integral of $bel_{\mathrm in}$. In practice, the latter should normalize to $1$.
  
 ----- -----
 === Discussion === === Discussion ===
-$N^*$ is supposed to be the normalization of the whole term on the right of it - a normalization to the sum/​integral of $bel_{\mathrm in}$. In practice, the latter should normalize to $1$. 
- 
 $K_u(x,​x'​)$ ought to capture the propagation,​ possibly determined by actions $u$. $K_u(x,​x'​)$ ought to capture the propagation,​ possibly determined by actions $u$.
  
 $W_z$ ought to capture a redistribution of believe, due to some observation $z$. $W_z$ ought to capture a redistribution of believe, due to some observation $z$.
 +
 +The relation with Bayes rule is discussed in [[Conditional probability ]].
  
 == Note == == Note ==
Line 47: Line 50:
 [[Function]] [[Function]]
 === Related === === Related ===
-[[Factorial function]]+[[Factorial function]], 
 +[[Conditional probability ​]]
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition