Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
classical_canonical_partition_function [2016/03/09 11:27] nikolaj |
classical_canonical_partition_function [2016/03/09 11:41] nikolaj |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| Note that in QM, there is no phase spaces to smoothly integrate over. | Note that in QM, there is no phase spaces to smoothly integrate over. | ||
| - | >Experimental observation says that certain objects (the ones involved in experiments measuring the energy spectrum from a box, the sun, etc.) the itegrand $E\,\dfrac{{\mathrm e}^{-\beta\,E}}{Z(\beta)}\,D(E)$ ought to be replaces by $\propto E\,\dfrac{1}{\mathrm e^{\beta\hbar\omega}-1}\,E^2$. For a single particle and $E\propto \omega\propto |k|$, it can indeed by argued that $D(E)\propto E^2$, see [[Classical density of states|density of states]]. | + | >Experimental observation says that certain objects (the ones involved in experiments measuring the energy spectrum from a box, the sun, etc.) the itegrand $E\,\dfrac{{\mathrm e}^{-\beta\,E}}{Z(\beta)}\,D(E)$ ought to be replaces by $\propto E\,\dfrac{1}{\mathrm e^{\beta\hbar\omega}-1}\,E^2$. |
| + | >For a single particle and $E\propto \omega\propto |k|$, it can indeed by argued that $D(E)\propto E^2$, see [[Classical density of states|density of states]]. The temperature dependency of the energy distribution however isn't observed to follow a Boltzmann Distribution but instead a statistics known from the [[Grand canonical partition function]]. | ||
| > | > | ||
| - | >Planck's ad hoc step is to say that any radiation ray of energy $E$ is actually partitioned into $n$ parts of $(\hbar\omega)$. Here $n$ isn't fixed but partioning is instead also thermailzed (that's basically the Definition of a black body) and thus follows a Boltzmann distribution in $(n\hbar\omega)$. This amounts to raplacing certain functions of energy (they are energy densities, if we introduce spatial variables into the model) | + | >Planck's ad hoc step is to say that any radiation ray of energy $E$ is actually partitioned into $n$ parts of $(\hbar\omega)$. Here $n$ isn't fixed but partioning is instead also thermailzed (that's basically the Definition of a black body) and thus follows a Boltzmann distribution in $(n\hbar\omega)$. His derivation amounts to raplacing certain functions of energy (they are energy densities, if we introduce spatial variables into the model) |
| - | > | + | |
| - | >Roughly | + | |
| - | > | + | |
| - | >$\int {\mathrm d}E\cdot p_E \, \mapsto \, \sum_{n=0}^\infty\int{\mathrm d}\,(n\hbar\omega)\,p_\omega(n)\,\mapsto\,\sum_{n=0}^\infty\int{\mathrm d}\,(n\hbar|k|)\,|k|^2\,p_k(n)$ | + | |
| > | > | ||
| >If we compare the classical expression with the empirical result, the replacement must be | >If we compare the classical expression with the empirical result, the replacement must be | ||
