Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
diagonal_construction [2016/01/11 10:52]
nikolaj
diagonal_construction [2016/01/13 10:28]
nikolaj
Line 9: Line 9:
 The point of $ D_f \subseteq C $ defined as above is this: Given any set $C$, if one attempted to use its elements to index its subsets, i.e. via a function $f:C\to \mathcal P(C)$, then the "​flipped diagonal subset"​ $ D_f \in {\mathcal P}$ will always be found to be missed. The point of $ D_f \subseteq C $ defined as above is this: Given any set $C$, if one attempted to use its elements to index its subsets, i.e. via a function $f:C\to \mathcal P(C)$, then the "​flipped diagonal subset"​ $ D_f \in {\mathcal P}$ will always be found to be missed.
  
-//Proof of the above and also proof of Cantor'​s theorem//: For all $x,X$, we eighter have $x\in X$ or $x\notin X$. Hence, for all $x,X,Y$, we have $  (X=Y) \Rightarrow \neg(x\in X\land x\notin Y)$, which is the same as $(x\in X\land x\notin Y) \Rightarrow \neg(X=Y)$. Specifically,​ for any $x\in D_f$ and using $X=D_f$ and $Y=f(x)$, the left hand side reads $x\in D_f\land x\notin f(x)$, and so $\neg(f(x)=D_f)$,​ which means $\nexists x\ (f(x)=D_f)$. But since $D_f\subseteq C$, i.e. $D_f \in  \mathcal P(C) =\text{codom}(f)$,​ we see that no such $f$ is a surjection, let alone a bijection. So the cardinality of any set is less than that of its power set. $\Box$+//Proof of the above and also proof of Cantor'​s theorem//: For all $x,X$, we eighter have $x\in X$ or $x\notin X$. Hence, for all $x,X,Y$, we have  
 + 
 +$(X=Y) \Rightarrow \neg(x\in X\land x\notin Y),
 + 
 +which is the same as  
 + 
 +$(x\in X\land x\notin Y) \Rightarrow \neg(X=Y).$  
 + 
 +Specifically,​ for any $x\in D_f$ and using $X=D_f$ and $Y=f(x)$, the left hand side reads $x\in D_f\land x\notin f(x)$, and so $\neg(f(x)=D_f)$,​ which means $\nexists x\ (f(x)=D_f)$. But since $D_f\subseteq C$, i.e. $D_f \in  \mathcal P(C) =\text{codom}(f)$,​ we see that no such $f$ is a surjection, let alone a bijection. So the cardinality of any set is less than that of its power set. $\Box$
  
 If, in a similar spirit, $C,f$ are taken to be a sequence and an enumeration of sequences, then we see that there is at least once sequence which escapes enumeration. This further translates to the uncountability of real numbers. ​ If, in a similar spirit, $C,f$ are taken to be a sequence and an enumeration of sequences, then we see that there is at least once sequence which escapes enumeration. This further translates to the uncountability of real numbers. ​
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition