Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
domain_of_discourse [2015/10/10 13:09] nikolaj |
domain_of_discourse [2015/10/10 13:09] nikolaj |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| * ${\mathfrak D}_\mathrm{Collections}$ ... [[Collections]], ad hoc subclasses of the above sorts (I use this as in some sort of naive set theory) | * ${\mathfrak D}_\mathrm{Collections}$ ... [[Collections]], ad hoc subclasses of the above sorts (I use this as in some sort of naive set theory) | ||
| - | I also use those to classify the bulk of other entries in the wiki. | + | I also use those to classify the bulk of other entries in the wiki. |
| + | There are also a minority of entries of type **Type**, as in //type theory//. They need not be part of the above framework. | ||
| All **Set** entry definitions are purposely free from terms of the other domains, except for functions and tuples of sets (though tuples and also the functions we consider can just as well be modeled within a set theory, so that's just for clarity.). In this way, the set entries in this wiki can e.g. be interpreted as defining object within formal ZFC. | All **Set** entry definitions are purposely free from terms of the other domains, except for functions and tuples of sets (though tuples and also the functions we consider can just as well be modeled within a set theory, so that's just for clarity.). In this way, the set entries in this wiki can e.g. be interpreted as defining object within formal ZFC. | ||
| - | |||
| - | There are also a minority of entries dedicated to **Type**s, as in //type theory//. They need not be part of the above framework. | ||
| ----- | ----- | ||
