Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
domain_of_discourse [2015/10/10 13:09]
nikolaj
domain_of_discourse [2015/10/10 13:46]
nikolaj
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Domain of discourse ===== ===== Domain of discourse =====
 ==== Meta ==== ==== Meta ====
-The following types form the primitive notions which, in this wiki, are not formally defined in terms of other concepts.  +I also use the following types to classify ​the bulk of other entries ​in the wiki and these are the entries ​with formal content
-Nevertheless,​ their possible axiomatics are discussed ​in entries ​of type **Framework**.+
  
-  * ${\mathfrak D}_\mathrm{Propositions}$ ... [[Propositions]] 
   * ${\mathfrak D}_\mathrm{Sets}$ ... [[Sets]]   * ${\mathfrak D}_\mathrm{Sets}$ ... [[Sets]]
   * ${\mathfrak D}_{\to}$ ... [[Functions]]   * ${\mathfrak D}_{\to}$ ... [[Functions]]
Line 13: Line 11:
   * ${\mathfrak D}_\mathrm{Collections}$ ... [[Collections]],​ ad hoc subclasses of the above sorts (I use this as in some sort of naive set theory)   * ${\mathfrak D}_\mathrm{Collections}$ ... [[Collections]],​ ad hoc subclasses of the above sorts (I use this as in some sort of naive set theory)
  
-I also use those to classify the bulk of other entries ​in the wiki+The domains themselves are primitive notions. 
 +Usage and axiomatics ​of those domains are discussed ​in entries of type **Framework**.
 There are also a minority of entries of type **Type**, as in //type theory//. They need not be part of the above framework. There are also a minority of entries of type **Type**, as in //type theory//. They need not be part of the above framework.
  
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition