Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
equivalence_relation [2013/05/23 17:19]
nikolaj
equivalence_relation [2014/03/21 11:11] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Equivalence relation ===== ===== Equivalence relation =====
-==== Definition ​==== +==== Set ==== 
-$X$ | +@#55CCEE: context ​    @#​55CCEE: ​$X$ |
-| $ \sim \in\text{Rel}(X$ |+
  
-$ \sim \in \text{EquivRel}(X) $ ^+| @#FFBB00: definiendum | @#​FFBB00: ​$ \sim \in \text{EquivRel}(X) $ |
  
-The relation ​$Ris an equivalence relationif it's in the intersection of all reflexiveall symmetric and all transitive relation. Hence +| @#55CCEE: context ​    | @#​55CCEE: ​\sim  \in \mathrm{Rel}(X) ​
 +| $x,y,z\in X$ |
  
-\forall_{\text{dom}(\sim)} x\ (\langle x,x\rangle \in \sim) ^ +| @#55EE55: postulate ​  | @#​55EE55: ​x\sim x $ | 
-(\langle ​x,y\rangle \in \sim\Leftrightarrow ​(\langle ​y,x\rangle \in \sim^ +| @#55EE55: postulate ​  | @#​55EE55: ​$ x\sim \Leftrightarrow y\sim | 
-(\langle ​x,y\rangle \in \sim\land (\langle ​y,z\rangle \in \sim\Leftrightarrow ​(\langle ​x,z\rangle \in \sim^+| @#55EE55: postulate ​  | @#​55EE55: ​$ x\sim \land y\sim \Leftrightarrow x\sim |
  
-==== Ramifications ​====+==== Discussion ​==== 
 +The relation $\sim$ is an equivalence relation, if it's in the intersection of all reflexive, all symmetric and all transitive relation. Hence 
 === Reference === === Reference ===
 Wikipedia: [[http://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Equivalence_relation|Equivalence relation]] Wikipedia: [[http://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Equivalence_relation|Equivalence relation]]
-==== Context ​====+==== Parents ​====
 === Subset of === === Subset of ===
 [[Reflexive relation]], [[Symmetric relation]], [[Transitive relation]] [[Reflexive relation]], [[Symmetric relation]], [[Transitive relation]]
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition