Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
k-partite_graph [2014/02/11 00:45]
nikolaj
k-partite_graph [2014/02/11 00:53]
nikolaj
Line 2: Line 2:
 ==== Set ==== ==== Set ====
 | @#88DDEE: $k\in\mathrm N$ | | @#88DDEE: $k\in\mathrm N$ |
-| @#88DDEE: $V,E$ ... set |+| @#88DDEE: $V$ ... set |
  
 | @#FFBB00: $\langle V,E\rangle \in \mathrm{it}(E,​V) $ | | @#FFBB00: $\langle V,E\rangle \in \mathrm{it}(E,​V) $ |
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 | @#DDDDDD: $ i,​j\in\{1,​\dots,​k\} $ | | @#DDDDDD: $ i,​j\in\{1,​\dots,​k\} $ |
-| @#DDDDDD: $ X_1,​\dots,​X_k\subset V$$\forall i,j.\ X_i\cap X_j=\emptyset $ |+| @#DDDDDD: $ X_1,​\dots,​X_k\subset V $ 
 +| @#DDDDDD: $ \bigcup_i X_i=V $ | 
 +| @#​DDDDDD: ​$ \forall i,j.\ X_i\cap X_j=\emptyset $ |
 | @#DDDDDD: $ v,w\in V $ | | @#DDDDDD: $ v,w\in V $ |
  
-| @#55EE55: $\exists X_1,​\dots,​X_k.\ \forall u,v.\ \{u,v\}\in E(\psi)\implies \forall i.\ \neg(v\in X_i\land w\in X_i) $ |+| @#55EE55: $\exists X_1,​\dots,​X_k.\ \forall u,v.\ \{u,v\}\in E\implies \forall i.\ \neg(v\in X_i\land w\in X_i) $ |
  
 ==== Discussion ==== ==== Discussion ====
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition