Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
k-partite_graph [2014/02/11 00:45]
nikolaj
k-partite_graph [2014/02/11 00:54]
nikolaj
Line 2: Line 2:
 ==== Set ==== ==== Set ====
 | @#88DDEE: $k\in\mathrm N$ | | @#88DDEE: $k\in\mathrm N$ |
-| @#88DDEE: $V,E$ ... set |+| @#88DDEE: $V$ ... set |
  
 | @#FFBB00: $\langle V,E\rangle \in \mathrm{it}(E,​V) $ | | @#FFBB00: $\langle V,E\rangle \in \mathrm{it}(E,​V) $ |
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 | @#DDDDDD: $ i,​j\in\{1,​\dots,​k\} $ | | @#DDDDDD: $ i,​j\in\{1,​\dots,​k\} $ |
-| @#DDDDDD: $ X_1,\dots,​X_k\subset ​V$$\forall i,j.\ X_i\cap X_j=\emptyset $ |+| @#DDDDDD: $ \bigcup_i X_i=V $ 
 +| @#​DDDDDD: ​$ \forall i,j.\ X_i\cap X_j=\emptyset $ |
 | @#DDDDDD: $ v,w\in V $ | | @#DDDDDD: $ v,w\in V $ |
  
-| @#55EE55: $\exists X_1,​\dots,​X_k.\ \forall u,v.\ \{u,v\}\in E(\psi)\implies \forall i.\ \neg(v\in X_i\land w\in X_i) $ |+| @#55EE55: $\exists X_1,​\dots,​X_k.\ \forall u,v.\ \{u,v\}\in E\implies \forall i.\ \neg(v\in X_i\land w\in X_i) $ |
  
 ==== Discussion ==== ==== Discussion ====
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition