Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
k-partite_graph [2014/02/11 00:52]
nikolaj
k-partite_graph [2014/03/21 11:11] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== k-partite graph ===== ===== k-partite graph =====
 ==== Set ==== ==== Set ====
-| @#88DDEE: $k\in\mathrm N$ | +| @#55CCEE: context ​    | @#55CCEE: $k\in\mathrm N$ | 
-| @#88DDEE: $V$ ... set |+| @#55CCEE: context ​    | @#55CCEE: $V$ ... set |
  
-| @#FFBB00: $\langle V,E\rangle \in \mathrm{it}(E,​V) $ |+| @#FFBB00: definiendum ​| @#FFBB00: $\langle V,E\rangle \in \mathrm{it}(E,​V) $ |
  
-| @#AAFFAA: $ \langle V,E\rangle $ ... undirected graph |+| @#AAFFAA: inclusion ​  | @#AAFFAA: $ \langle V,E\rangle $ ... undirected graph |
  
-| @#DDDDDD: $ i,​j\in\{1,​\dots,​k\} $ | +| @#DDDDDD: range       | @#DDDDDD: $ i,​j\in\{1,​\dots,​k\} $ | 
-| @#DDDDDD: $ X_1,​\dots,​X_k\subset V$,\ \bigcup_i X_i=V,\ $\forall i,j.\ X_i\cap X_j=\emptyset $ | +| @#DDDDDD: range       | @#DDDDDD: $ \bigcup_i X_i=V $ | 
-| @#DDDDDD: $ v,w\in V $ |+| @#DDDDDD: range       | @#​DDDDDD: ​$ \forall i,j.\ X_i\cap X_j=\emptyset $ | 
 +| @#DDDDDD: range       | @#DDDDDD: $ v,w\in V $ |
  
-| @#55EE55: $\exists X_1,​\dots,​X_k.\ \forall u,v.\ \{u,v\}\in E\implies \forall i.\ \neg(v\in X_i\land w\in X_i) $ |+| @#55EE55: postulate ​  | @#55EE55: $\exists X_1,​\dots,​X_k.\ \forall u,v.\ \{u,v\}\in E\implies \forall i.\ \neg(v\in X_i\land w\in X_i) $ |
  
 ==== Discussion ==== ==== Discussion ====
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition