Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
on_electronics_._note [2016/07/20 21:31]
nikolaj
on_electronics_._note [2016/07/23 15:23]
nikolaj
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 $[R]=\dfrac{1}{[q_x]^2}$ $[R]=\dfrac{1}{[q_x]^2}$
 +
 +== Field theory ==
 +On a very encompassing level, we should maybe view all those problems as question of the dynamics of charge collections,​ making for a charge density (making up $q_x$) under external forces (contributing to the voltages in the system). The charges interact, or put differently,​ the charge density self-interacts.
  
 == Models for devices == == Models for devices ==
 +>$G = a_R + a_C \dfrac{\partial}{\partial t} + a_L \int{\mathrm d}t$
 +
 An capacitor are two ends of a conducting line that hold charges with a some voltage between them. Ideally, i.e. in the simplest case, we double the voltage if we double the charges - thus the number $C:​=\frac{q_x}{U}$ is a constant. The factor $\frac{1}{C}$ says how strongly $U$ rises in reaction to a rise of $q_x$. Expressing that rise in terms of the time dependent incoming charge current, $q_x\propto \int^t I(t)$, we find $G{\sim}C\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}$. An capacitor are two ends of a conducting line that hold charges with a some voltage between them. Ideally, i.e. in the simplest case, we double the voltage if we double the charges - thus the number $C:​=\frac{q_x}{U}$ is a constant. The factor $\frac{1}{C}$ says how strongly $U$ rises in reaction to a rise of $q_x$. Expressing that rise in terms of the time dependent incoming charge current, $q_x\propto \int^t I(t)$, we find $G{\sim}C\dfrac{\partial}{\partial t}$.
  
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition