Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
particle_number_expectation_value [2014/03/21 11:11]
127.0.0.1 external edit
particle_number_expectation_value [2015/08/16 13:27]
nikolaj
Line 5: Line 5:
 | @#FFBB00: definiendum | @#FFBB00: $ \langle\hat N\rangle(\beta,​\mu) := \sum_{N=0}^\infty w_N(\beta,​\mu)\cdot N $  | | @#FFBB00: definiendum | @#FFBB00: $ \langle\hat N\rangle(\beta,​\mu) := \sum_{N=0}^\infty w_N(\beta,​\mu)\cdot N $  |
  
-==== Discussion ====+-----
 The notation "​$\langle\hat N\rangle$"​ is chosen for the function because we can also introduce the sequence of observables $\hat N$ defined to give us the particle number of each canonical ensemble, i.e. $\hat N_N=N$, and then the above coincides with the proper [[grand canonical expectation value]] of $\hat N$. Notice that this $\hat N$ is sometimes denoted by $N$, which can get a little confusing. The notation "​$\langle\hat N\rangle$"​ is chosen for the function because we can also introduce the sequence of observables $\hat N$ defined to give us the particle number of each canonical ensemble, i.e. $\hat N_N=N$, and then the above coincides with the proper [[grand canonical expectation value]] of $\hat N$. Notice that this $\hat N$ is sometimes denoted by $N$, which can get a little confusing.
  
Line 18: Line 18:
  
   * The entry [[grand canonical partition function]] shortly discusses free bosons and fermions. ​   * The entry [[grand canonical partition function]] shortly discusses free bosons and fermions. ​
-==== Parents ====+ 
 +-----
 === Context === === Context ===
 [[Grand canonical weight]] [[Grand canonical weight]]
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition