Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
power_set [2015/10/08 14:24]
nikolaj
power_set [2015/10/08 20:35]
nikolaj
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 ----- -----
-=== Discussion === 
 Here we define Here we define
  
 $\mathcal{P}(X) \equiv \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$ $\mathcal{P}(X) \equiv \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$
  
-and want to claim that for each $X$, we have+which is sensible in our set theory if, for each set $X$, we have
  
 $\exists! P.\,P = \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$ $\exists! P.\,P = \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$
  
-or more formally+ormore formally,
  
 $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,P = \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$ $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,P = \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$
Line 23: Line 22:
 $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow Y\subseteq X\right)$ $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow Y\subseteq X\right)$
  
-which is short for+=== Discussion === 
 +The above is short for
  
 $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow \forall Z.\,(Z\in Y\implies Z\in X)\right)$ $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow \forall Z.\,(Z\in Y\implies Z\in X)\right)$
  
-The existence ​is granted ​from the [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Axiom_of_power_set|Axiom of power set]] +and this is, apart from the exclamation mark,​exactly ​the [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Axiom_of_power_set|Axiom of power set]].
- +
-$\forall X.\,\exists P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow \forall Z.\,(Z\in Y\implies Z\in X)\right)$+
  
-and uniqueness follows from extensionality.+Like in the case of the [[empty set]], ​uniqueness follows from extensionality.
  
 == Examples == == Examples ==
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition