Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
power_set [2015/10/08 14:24]
nikolaj
power_set [2015/10/08 20:35]
nikolaj
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 ----- -----
-=== Discussion === 
 Here we define Here we define
  
 $\mathcal{P}(X) \equiv \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$ $\mathcal{P}(X) \equiv \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$
  
-and want to claim that for each $X$, we have+which is sensible in our set theory if, for each set $X$, we have
  
 $\exists! P.\,P = \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$ $\exists! P.\,P = \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$
  
-or more formally+ormore formally,
  
 $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,P = \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$ $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,P = \{Y\mid Y\subseteq X\}$
Line 23: Line 22:
 $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow Y\subseteq X\right)$ $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow Y\subseteq X\right)$
  
-which is short for+=== Discussion === 
 +The above is short for
  
 $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow \forall Z.\,(Z\in Y\implies Z\in X)\right)$ $\forall X.\,​\exists! P.\,\forall Y.\,​\left(Y\in P\Leftrightarrow \forall Z.\,(Z\in Y\implies Z\in X)\right)$
  
-Without ​the exclamation mark, this is exactly the [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Axiom_of_power_set|Axiom of power set]]. +and this is, apart from the exclamation mark,​exactly the [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Axiom_of_power_set|Axiom of power set]]. 
-Uniqueness ​follows from extensionality.+ 
 +Like in the case of the [[empty set]], uniqueness ​follows from extensionality.
  
 == Examples == == Examples ==
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition