Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
terminal_morphism [2014/09/26 15:58]
nikolaj
terminal_morphism [2014/09/28 19:46]
nikolaj
Line 9: Line 9:
 | @#FFFDDD: for all     | @#FFFDDD: $\psi:{\bf C}[FA,Z]$ | | @#FFFDDD: for all     | @#FFFDDD: $\psi:{\bf C}[FA,Z]$ |
 | @#DDDDDD: range       | @#DDDDDD: $f:{\bf D}[A,B]$ |  | @#DDDDDD: range       | @#DDDDDD: $f:{\bf D}[A,B]$ | 
-| @#55EE55: postulate ​  | @#55EE55: $\exists!f.\ \psi=\phi\circ F(f)$ |+| @#55EE55: postulate ​  | @#55EE55: $\exists_!f.\ \psi=\phi\circ F(f)$ |
  
 ==== Discussion ==== ==== Discussion ====
 +=== Terminology ===
 Note that the name "​terminal //​morphisms//"​ for $\langle B,​\phi\rangle$ is slightly confusing, because the data is not just the morphism $\phi$ going from $F(B)$ to $Z$, but also the object $B$.  Note that the name "​terminal //​morphisms//"​ for $\langle B,​\phi\rangle$ is slightly confusing, because the data is not just the morphism $\phi$ going from $F(B)$ to $Z$, but also the object $B$. 
 +
 +=== Idea ===
 +You want to specify a smaller world within ${\bf C}$. You do this by setting up another category ${\bf D}$ and mapping it into ${\bf C}$ with a functor $F$. The image of $F$ is your smaller world. ​
 +
 +For a fixed object $Z$, a universal morphism $\phi$ is then defined by demanding that every arrow from this small world which tries to connect $Z$, must pass through it. In other words (and now I just state the definition):​ For all objects $B$ in ${\bf D}$, if $\psi$ is an arrow in ${\bf C}$ from $FB$ to $Z$, then there must be an arrow $f$ within ${\bf D}$, so that $\phi$ is really just a combination of "small world business"​ $F(f)$, followed by the kind of gate function $\phi$, finally leading to $Z$. 
 +
 +For the reason that everything going on in the image of $F$ must pass to $Z$ only through $\phi$, one says $\phi$ is the terminal morphism "from the functor $F$ to the object $Z$".
  
 == Example: The exponential object and currying == == Example: The exponential object and currying ==
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition