Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
undirected_graph [2014/02/09 20:51] nikolaj |
undirected_graph [2014/02/09 20:51] nikolaj |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ==== Discussion ==== | ==== Discussion ==== | ||
| - | In the above definition, the set $E=\{a,b,\dots\}$ in $\langle E,\psi\rangle$ is any set whos elements then each label an edge, e.g. $\psi(a)=\{v,u\}$. | + | In the above definition, the set $E=\{a,b,\dots\}$ in $\langle E,\psi\rangle$ is any set whos elements then each label an edge, e.g. $\psi(a)=\{v,w\}$. |
| Instead, one can also define a graph using a [[multiset]] $\langle E_\mathrm{ends},m\rangle$ where $E_\mathrm{ends}=\{\{v,w\},\{u,w\},\dots\}$ is itself a set of endpoints and $m:E_\mathrm{ends}\to\mathbb N$ counts the number of instances such a pair is part of the graph. The definitions are of course practically equivalent, but the definition with $\psi$ de-emphasises the focus on "$v$ and $w$ from $V$ are things which are connected" in favor of "$a$ is something from $E$ which connects the things $v$ and $w$ from $V$". | Instead, one can also define a graph using a [[multiset]] $\langle E_\mathrm{ends},m\rangle$ where $E_\mathrm{ends}=\{\{v,w\},\{u,w\},\dots\}$ is itself a set of endpoints and $m:E_\mathrm{ends}\to\mathbb N$ counts the number of instances such a pair is part of the graph. The definitions are of course practically equivalent, but the definition with $\psi$ de-emphasises the focus on "$v$ and $w$ from $V$ are things which are connected" in favor of "$a$ is something from $E$ which connects the things $v$ and $w$ from $V$". | ||
