Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
undirected_graph [2014/02/09 20:51]
nikolaj
undirected_graph [2014/02/10 23:16]
nikolaj
Line 13: Line 13:
 In the above definition, the set $E=\{a,​b,​\dots\}$ in $\langle E,​\psi\rangle$ is any set whos elements then each label an edge, e.g. $\psi(a)=\{v,​w\}$. ​ In the above definition, the set $E=\{a,​b,​\dots\}$ in $\langle E,​\psi\rangle$ is any set whos elements then each label an edge, e.g. $\psi(a)=\{v,​w\}$. ​
  
-Instead, one can also define a graph using a [[multiset]] $\langle E_\mathrm{ends},​m\rangle$ where $E_\mathrm{ends}=\{\{v,​w\},​\{u,​w\},​\dots\}$ is itself a set of endpoints and $m:​E_\mathrm{ends}\to\mathbb N$ counts the number of instances such a pair is part of the graph. The definitions are of course practically equivalent, ​but the definition with $\psi$ de-emphasises the focus on "$v$ and $w$ from $V$ are things which are connected"​ in favor of "$a$ is something from $E$ which connects the things $v$ and $w$ from $V$".+Instead, one can also define a graph using a [[multiset]] $\langle E_\mathrm{ends},​m\rangle$ where $E_\mathrm{ends}=\{\{v,​w\},​\{u,​w\},​\dots\}$ is itself a set of endpoints and $m:​E_\mathrm{ends}\to\mathbb N$ counts the number of instances such a pair is part of the graph. The definitions are of course practically equivalent, the definition ​above with $\psi$ de-emphasises the focus on "$v$ and $w$ from $V$ are things which are connected"​ in favor of "$a$ is something from $E$ which connects the things $v$ and $w$ from $V$".
 ==== Parents ==== ==== Parents ====
 === Subset of === === Subset of ===
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition