Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- wat [2016/02/11 11:02]
nikolaj
+++ wat [2016/04/13 16:23]
nikolaj
@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Here I write down some syntax ideas for **WAT - Writing And Typing**, a programming language with a dependent type system that can very easily be parsed to the standard mathematical syntax you wouldd encounter in physics papers.
->In the best case, the type both makes for an interesting mathematical structure (an $\infty$-topos?) **and** is expressive enough to formalize such structures.
+>In the best case, the type both makes for an interesting mathematical structure (an $\infty$-topos?) or embeds in one (the point is that ist semantics should be easy understandable ("easy" from my POV at least)) **and** is expressive enough to formalize such structures.
 In view of using it as starting point in [[Outline]], one could first do the latter and then explain this aspect of WAT as primary semantic example.
 >>What's a faithful model of (to-be) WAT?
+>>>You can start with almost any dependently typed language, even if parts are missing, if you label/deny using/rule out the potentially dangerous possibilites/implementations there. What's left is something simple and right.
+So todo: Make a list of what you actually WANT1111!!! --> What's the smallest theory permitting a semantic model that has all the stuff I like?
 === Motivation ===