Processing math: 100%

Seperated presheaf

Collection

context X,TX … topological space
definiendum F in it
inclusion F in SetOp(X)op
for all UTX
for all s,tFU
for all CU … open cover(U)
postulate ((VCU). s|V=t|V)s=t

Discussion

Here we use the notation discussed in presheaf. I.e. in the last line, “s|V=t|V” is notation for “F(i)(s)=F(i)(t)”, where i:VU.

Elaboration

A presheaf in topology assigns a set FU to each open set U of a topological space X,T. A sheaf is a presheaf fulfilling two axioms ('locality' and 'gluing') and it's intended to capture the case where FU are sets of sections over a topological space (e.g. the section of a fibre bundle p:EX, e.g. vector fields, e.g. all 1-forms) and the arrows F(i) are restrictions of those section to smaller open sets. The definition of a seperated presheaf is the first step towards the definition of a sheaf.

Locality axiom: To understand the postulate, recall that for sections s,t:UY (or function in general) we trivially have that

s=t(xU).s(x)=t(x) and as corollary we have s=t(VU).s|V=t|V .

Sections also fulfill function extensionality, which goes in the reverse direction

((xU).s(x)=t(x))s=t and consequently, if CU is a covering of U, then ((VCU).s|V=t|V)s=t .

Now if the FU's of a sheaf are to be a sets of such sections over a topological space, then it should be that the maps F(i) between them can be seen as restriction of the function domains. To this end, if i:VU is the inclusion of a small open set V in another U, require that if s,tFU agree on all restricted domains which make up the cover of U, i.e. F(i)(s)=F(i)(t), then there can be no other way in which they can differ, so s=t.

Reference

Wikipedia: Sheaf

Parents

Context

Topological space

Subset of

Presheaf . topology

Requirements

Open cover