Processing math: 100%

Harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian

Function

A=κ(1κ(Lx)2+κ(xx0L)2)


Discussion

Remark

Another “quantum harmonical oscillator” is a model which looks similar, except x is an operator x(t) (and one a priori more general than right multiplication by x as here) and where instead of x we consider 1L2x(t). In this case, we can may have κ depend on t too.

It's basically a matter on how the a's end up looking and in what way they relate to the ground state of the system.

Interpretation

We describe a system with 1-dim degree of freedom, x, and a potential with no degrees of freedom. The “spring constant” κ in the “interaction term” with κx quantifies the penalty for x being away from x0.

Completing the square

Introducing a new variable l via L=κl lets us pull out κ as an overall multiplicative constant of the operator.

Further, with

a=u(xx0l+lx)

a=v(xx0llx)

we find

A=κ(uvaa+1)

(as [x,x]ψ(x)=(xψ(x))xψ(x)=ψ(x))

We choose u,v with uv=12, e.g. u=v=12 so that

A=κ2(aa+12)

A=κ(1+2aa)

The eigenstates are the sum of the two systems, although, again, the model for the potential is trivial.

Eigenstate

So the kernel of a are eigenstates of A and with eigenvalue κ. Consider a normalized one, |0. With

ϕ(x)=exp(12(xx0l)2)

we get

lxϕ(x)=xx0lϕ(x)

and so |0ϕ(x).

Note that thus a acts as a multiplication operator with factor 212xx0l (we get Hermite polynomials),

and it remains to demonstrate how those are eigenstates.
todo: Compute [A,a], which is a

Reference

Subset of

Reference

Subset of

Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition