This is an old revision of the document!


On category theory basics

Guide

From every category, we can obtain another one by simply flipping the arguments of concatenation.


As far as objects $A,B\in{\bf C}$ are concerned, functors $F$ in ${\bf C}\longrightarrow{\bf D}$ are plain functions, acting via $A\mapsto FA$. For this reason, people sometimes only think of object map when thinking about certain functors, but it's generally very important to remember the arrow map, which in a sense is much finer. Note that the functors object map implicitly also maps the hom-classes “${\bf C}[A,B]\mapsto{\bf C}[FA,FB]$”. Now while $F$ doesn't care for any “internal” details of the objects (e.g. the elements, in case the objects are sets), it does indeed care for the terms of the hom-classes!

vorsicht.jpeg


As opposed to functors defined above, natural transformations indeed look at the “internal” details objects.

Parents

Sequel of

Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition