Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
seperated_presheaf [2014/10/29 09:55]
nikolaj
seperated_presheaf [2014/10/29 14:29]
nikolaj
Line 7: Line 7:
 | @#FFFDDD: for all     | @#FFFDDD: $s,t\in FU$ | | @#FFFDDD: for all     | @#FFFDDD: $s,t\in FU$ |
 | @#FFFDDD: for all     | @#FFFDDD: $C_U$ ... open cover$(U)$ | | @#FFFDDD: for all     | @#FFFDDD: $C_U$ ... open cover$(U)$ |
-| @#55EE55: postulate ​  | @#55EE55: $\left(\forall (V\in C_U).\ ​F(i)(s)=F(i)(t)\right) \implies s=t$ |+| @#55EE55: postulate ​  | @#55EE55: $\left(\forall (V\in C_U).\ s|_V=t|_V\right) \implies s=t$ |
  
 ==== Discussion ==== ==== Discussion ====
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 ===Elaboration=== ===Elaboration===
-A presheaf in topology assigns a set $FU$ to each open set $U$ of a topological space $\langle X,\mathcal T\rangle$. A [[sheaf]] is a presheaf fulfilling two axioms ('​locality'​ and '​gluing'​) and it's intended to capture the case where $FU$ are sets of sections over a topological space (e.g. the section of a fibre bundle $p:E\to X$, e.g. vector fields) and the arrows $F(i)$ are restrictions of those section to smaller open sets. The definition of a seperated presheaf is the first step towards the definition of a sheaf.+A presheaf in topology assigns a set $FU$ to each open set $U$ of a topological space $\langle X,\mathcal T\rangle$. A [[sheaf]] is a presheaf fulfilling two axioms ('​locality'​ and '​gluing'​) and it's intended to capture the case where $FU$ are sets of sections over a topological space (e.g. the section of a fibre bundle $p:E\to X$, e.g. vector fields, e.g. all 1-forms) and the arrows $F(i)$ are restrictions of those section to smaller open sets. The definition of a seperated presheaf is the first step towards the definition of a sheaf.
  
 **Locality axiom**: To understand the postulate, recall that for sections $s,t:U\to Y$ (or function in general) we trivially have that **Locality axiom**: To understand the postulate, recall that for sections $s,t:U\to Y$ (or function in general) we trivially have that
Link to graph
Log In
Improvements of the human condition